A Reconfigurable Subarray Architecture and Hybrid Beamforming for Millimeter-Wave Dual-Function-Radar-Communication Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dual-function-radar-communication (DFRC) is a promising candidate technology for next-generation networks. By integrating hybrid analog-digital (HAD) beamforming into a multi-user millimeter-wave (mmWave) DFRC system, we design a new reconfigurable subarray (RS) architecture and jointly optimize the HAD beamforming to maximize the communication sum-rate and ensure a prescribed signal-to-clutter-plus-noise ratio for radar sensing. Considering the non-convexity of this problem arising from multiplicative coupling of the analog and digital beamforming, we convert the sum-rate maximization into an equivalent weighted mean-square error minimization and apply penalty dual decomposition to decouple the analog and digital beamforming. Specifically, a second-order cone program is first constructed to optimize the fully digital counterpart of the HAD beamforming. Then, the sparsity of the RS architecture is exploited to obtain a low-complexity solution for the HAD beamforming. The convergence and complexity analyses of our algorithm are carried out under the RS architecture. Simulations corroborate that, with the RS architecture, DFRC offers effective communication and sensing and improves energy efficiency by 83.4% and 114.2% with a moderate number of radio frequency chains and phase shifters, compared to the persistently- and fully-connected architectures, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".