Enhancing the Safety of Autonomous Vehicles in Adverse Weather by Deep Learning-Based Object Detection
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recognizing and categorizing items in weather-adverse environments poses significant challenges for autonomous vehicles. To improve the robustness of object-detection systems, this paper introduces an innovative approach for detecting objects at different levels by leveraging sensors and deep learning-based solutions within a traffic circle. The suggested approach improves the effectiveness of single-stage object detectors, aiming to advance the performance in perceiving autonomous racing environments and minimizing instances of false detection and low recognition rates. The improved framework is based on the one-stage object-detection model, incorporating multiple lightweight backbones. Additionally, attention mechanisms are integrated to refine the object-detection process further. Our proposed model demonstrates superior performance compared to the state-of-the-art method on the DAWN dataset, achieving a mean average precision (mAP) of 99.1%, surpassing the previous result of 84.7%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it