MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396609193 · doi:10.1016/j.comgeo.2024.102103

Distance queries over dynamic interval graphs

2024· article· en· W4396609193 on OpenAlexafffund
Jingbang Chen, Meng He, J. Ian Munro, Richard Peng, Kaiyu Wu, D. Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueComputational Geometry · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Graph Theory Research
Canadian institutionsDalhousie UniversityUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsInterval (graph theory)Interval graphComputer scienceCombinatoricsMathematicsChordal graphTheoretical computer scienceGraph1-planar graph

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We design the first dynamic distance oracles for interval graphs, which are intersection graphs of a set of intervals on the real line, and for proper interval graphs, which are intersection graphs of a set of intervals in which no interval is properly contained in another. For proper interval graphs, we design a linear space data structure which supports distance queries (computing the distance between two query vertices) and vertex insertion or deletion in O(lg⁡n) worst-case time, where n is the number of vertices currently in G. Under incremental (insertion only) or decremental (deletion only) settings in general interval graphs, we design linear space data structures that support distance queries in O(lg⁡n) worst-case time and vertex insertion or deletion in O(lg⁡n) amortized time, where n is the maximum number of vertices in the graph. Under fully dynamic settings in general interval graphs, we design a data structure that represents an interval graph G in O(n) words of space to support distance queries in O(nlg⁡n/S(n)) worst-case time and vertex insertion or deletion in O(S(n)+lg⁡n) worst-case time, where n is the number of vertices currently in G and S(n) is an arbitrary function that satisfies S(n)=Ω(1) and S(n)=O(n). This implies an O(n)-word solution with O(nlg⁡n)-time support for both distance queries and updates. All four data structures can answer shortest path queries by reporting the vertices in the shortest path between two query vertices in O(lg⁡n) worst-case time per vertex. We also study the hardness of supporting distance queries under updates over an intersection graph of 3D axis-aligned line segments, which generalizes our problem to 3D. Finally, we solve the problem of computing the diameter of a dynamic connected interval graph.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.920
Threshold uncertainty score0.579

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComputational GeometrySame topicAdvanced Graph Theory ResearchFrench-language works237,207