MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396616397 · doi:10.5771/9783748919896-77

Kapitel 3) Einführung in ausgewählte völkerrechtliche Aspekte des Themas BHR zur Vorbereitung des Diskursvergleichs

2024· book-chapter· de· W4396616397 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Richard Dören

Bibliographic record

VenueNomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG eBooks · 2024
Typebook-chapter
Languagede
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEuropean and International Law Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of California, DavisMax-Planck-GesellschaftModern Law ReviewUniversity of OxfordArizona State UniversityYork UniversityUniversity of PennsylvaniaYale UniversityVanderbilt UniversityUniversity of CambridgePrinceton UniversityIpsenShell
KeywordsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

und deutschen Literatur besonders umfassend analysiert wurden.Dabei handelt es sich um die Völkerrechtssubjektivität pri

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.900
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.023

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG eBooksSame topicEuropean and International Law StudiesFrench-language works237,207