MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4396627509 · doi:10.11159/icnnfc24.151

FT Research on Glucose Adsorption and Detection Using Edge-Passivated Graphene

2024· article· en· W4396627509 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Kalpana Devi P, T Aiswarya, K. K. Singh

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the World Congress on Recent Advances in Nanotechnology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrochemical sensors and biosensors
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGrapheneAdsorptionEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionMaterials scienceChemical engineeringNanotechnologyComputer scienceChemistryArtificial intelligencePhysical chemistryEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There is a growing need to create non-enzymatic glucose sensors with excellent sensing accuracy and biocompatibility.Because of their distinct electronic characteristics, two-dimensional graphene-like nanomaterials and functionalized graphene now offer the best solutions available for the next generation of extremely sensitive glucose sensors.Consequently, we used DFT to study the glucose molecule's interaction with hydrogen-and fluorine-passivated graphene nanoflakes.In light of this, studies were conducted on the electronic, structural, and adsorption energy properties of glucose molecules adsorbed on these sheets.The findings suggest that the glucose molecule binds poorly with both sheets, exhibiting a low adsorption energy.These sheets cannot be utilised as electronic or work function-based sensors because the energy gap and work function values are not sensibly varied.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the World Congress on Recent Advances in Nanotechnology→Same topicElectrochemical sensors and biosensors→French-language works237,207→