MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396629258 · doi:10.1504/pcfd.2024.138197

Fin effectivity investigation at solid-liquid phase change in axisymmetric heat exchangers using lattice Boltzmann method

2024· article· en· W4396629258 on OpenAlex
Zeinab Hajamini, Hamed Moqtaderi, Sajedeh Kebriti

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProgress in Computational Fluid Dynamics An International Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRotational symmetryLattice Boltzmann methodsFinMaterials scienceHeat exchangerPhase changeThermodynamicsMechanicsPhysicsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this article is to analyse the fin parameters in a heat exchanger to optimise the melt rate of PCM. Shell and tube heat exchangers are considered. The shell contains PCM and annular fins placed on the tube wall. The fluid flow, heat transfer, and melting equations were solved using a 2D axisymmetric lattice Boltzmann method (LBM). LBM enthalpy-based method was developed in an axisymmetric form. According to our study of the effect of fin number and length on PCM melting rate, the optimal number of fins for thicknesses of , and is 3, 2, and 2, respectively, while the optimal length of fins for these thicknesses is 0.8R. Moreover, we also introduced a three-fin arrangement with uneven fin length, which increased melting rate. The effect of the secondary fin on the melting rate of PCM was also studied.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.103
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.396
Teacher spread0.347 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it