Pengaruh Resiliensi Akademik dan Self Efficacy Terhadap Stres Akademik
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sistem pembelajaran yang semula pembelajaran tatap muka menjadi pembelajaran online menimbulkan masalah yaitu stres akademik. Oleh karena itu, penting untuk diteliti. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh resiliensi akademik dan self efficacy terhadap stres akademik pada peserta didik kelas XI IPS SMA Negeri di Kecamatan Singaparna Tahun Ajaran 2022/2023. Metode yang digunakan yakni metode survey. Populasi dalam penelitian ini sebanyak 293 peserta didik, dan sampel sebanyak 169 peserta didik dengan menggunakan teknik perhitungan rumus slovin serta teknik pengambilan sampel yaitu simpel random sampling. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan kuesioner serta teknik analisis data menggunakan analisis regresi linier berganda dengan bantuan software SPSS 25. Adapun hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa : 1) Resiliensi akademik berpengaruh yang signifikan terhadap stres akademik dengan nilai signifikansi 0,039. 2) Self efficacy berpengaruh yang signifikan terhadap stres akademik dengan nilai signifikansi 0,000. 3) Resiliensi akademik dan self efficacy berpengaruh yang signifikan terhadap stres akademik dengan nilai signifikansi 0,000.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it