MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4396640149 · doi:10.1101/2024.05.02.592284

Rationally Designed Pooled CRISPRi-Seq Uncovers an Inhibitor of Bacterial Peptidyl-tRNA Hydrolase

2024· preprint· en· W4396640149 on OpenAlexaff
A. S. M. Zisanur Rahman, Egor A. Syroegin, Julieta Novomisky Nechcoff, Archit Devarajan, Yury S. Polikanov, Silvia T. Cardona

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHydrolaseComputational biologyChemistryBiologyMicrobiologyEnzymeBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Pooled knockdown libraries of essential genes are useful tools for elucidating the mechanisms of action of antibacterial compounds, a pivotal step in antibiotic discovery. However, achieving genomic coverage of antibacterial targets poses a challenge due to the uneven proliferation of knockdown mutants during pooled growth, leading to the unintended loss of important targets. To overcome this issue, we describe the construction of CIMPLE ( C RISPR i - m ediated p ooled library of e ssential genes), a rationally designed pooled knockdown library built in a model antibiotic-resistant bacteria, Burkholderia cenocepacia. By analyzing growth parameters of clonal knockdown populations of an arrayed CRISPRi library, we predicted strain depletion levels during pooled growth and adjusted mutant relative abundance, approaching genomic coverage of antibacterial targets during antibiotic exposure. We first benchmarked CIMPLE by chemical-genetic profiling of known antibacterials, then applied it to an uncharacterized bacterial growth inhibitor from a new class. CRISPRi-Seq with CIMPLE, followed by biochemical validation, revealed that the novel compound targets the peptidyl-tRNA hydrolase (Pth). Overall, CIMPLE leverages the advantages of arrayed and pooled CRISPRi libraries to uncover unexplored targets for antibiotic action. Summary Bacterial mutant libraries in which antibiotic targets are downregulated are useful tools to functionally characterize novel antimicrobials. These libraries are used for chemical-genetic profiling as target-compound interactions can be inferred by differential fitness of mutants during pooled growth. Mutants that are functionally related to the antimicrobial mode of action are usually depleted from the pool upon exposure to the drug. Although powerful, this method can fail when the unequal proliferation of mutant strains before exposure causes mutants to fall below the detection level in the library pool. To address this issue, we constructed an arrayed essential gene mutant library (EGML) in the antibiotic-resistant bacterium Burkholderia cenocepacia using CRISPR interference (CRISPRi) and analyzed the growth parameters of individual mutant strains. We then modelled depletion levels during pooled growth and used the model to rationally design an optimized CRISPR interference-mediated pooled library of essential genes (CIMPLE). By adjusting the initial inoculum of the knockdown mutants, we achieved coverage of the bacterial essential genome with mutant sensitization. We exposed CIMPLE to a recently discovered antimicrobial of a novel class and discovered it inhibits the peptidyl-tRNA hydrolase, an essential bacterial enzyme. In summary, we demonstrate the utility of CIMPLE and CRISPRi-Seq to uncover the mechanism of action of novel antimicrobial compounds. Graphical abstract

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms→French-language works237,207→