MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396648162 · doi:10.23977/jaip.2024.070205

Application Analysis of Computer Database System in Information Management

2024· article· en· W4396648162 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Xuwei Zhang, Yanfang Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Artificial Intelligence Practice · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Computational Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceDatabaseData administrationDatabase designDatabase schema

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the rapid development of computer technology, China has gradually entered the era of big data, computer has become an important tool for people's production and life, and the use of the Internet to share and transmit all kinds of data and information has become the normal enterprise production and operation. The emergence of the computer database system has brought more possibilities for the production and operation of enterprises. With the help of computer database system can make enterprise information management more targeted and practical, greatly meet the needs of people's use, and further promote the significant improvement of enterprise information management level. This paper will take the computer database system as the primary focus of its research. Through the analysis of the characteristics and advantages of this system, and in conjunction with the digital model of the computer database system, it aims to investigate the necessity of its application in information management. Additionally, the paper will focus on exploring the specific applications of the computer database system in information management, aiming to assist in the efficient completion of information management tasks and striving to enhance the development of the computer database system in the future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.892
Threshold uncertainty score0.270

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Artificial Intelligence PracticeSame topicAdvanced Computational Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207