Ethnography Of Traditional Bell Metal Craft Technology Practiced In Bankura District
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tradition of brass and bell metal work is still persisting in different parts of eastern India. Rarh Bengal is one of the most important traditional brass and bell-metal crafts region. These are non-industrial mode of technology and production, which is Practice by a number of hereditary groups. As example Kangsbanik, Karmakar, Kansari and Dhokra Kamar etc. Pukhuria (22.9351°N, 86.9662°E) is one important traditional bell metal technology center of Bankura district as well as Rarh Bengal, West Bengal, India. The artisans of Pukhuria village are specialized in making different sizes bell metal bowl and followed cast and wrought metal technique. This is locally known as Jam Bati, Ci Bati, Sada Bati etc. In this paper an attempt has been made to discuss the technological aspect of contemporary brass and bell metal work, which is practiced by artisans of Pukhuria, Bankura district. It may also highlight the sources of raw material, different tools, processing, finishing of objects etc.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".