MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396651740 · doi:10.1093/jas/skae102.130

149 Development of a leaky gut model: Impact of 24-h feed restriction on ileal expression of tight junction proteins in weaned pigs

2024· article· en· W4396651740 on OpenAlexaff
S. E. Schuling, Megan N Engeseth, Sue M Knudtson, Ran Song, Dan E Schimek

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicBarrier Structure and Function Studies
Canadian institutionsNutrasource
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTight junctionDevelopment (topology)BiologyExpression (computer science)Cell biologyMathematicsComputer scienceMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Weanling barrows, 26 to 28 d old [n = 90; Duroc terminal line Fast genetics, initial body weight (BW)= 5.63 ± 0.43 kg] were used to evaluate the effect of 24-h complete feed restriction on growth and intestinal integrity. Upon arrival at the NutriQuest modeling center (Fergus Falls, MN), pigs were weighed, blocked by BW, and randomly assigned to 1 of 30 pens. Five treatments were randomly assigned to 6 pens: 1) Positive Control (PC), and 4 treatments that had 24-hr feed restriction (FR); 2) Negative control (NC), 3) Direct Fed Microbial (DFM) A, 4) DFM B, and 5) DFM C. Feed intake and BW were determined weekly and before and after FR. All pigs were fed a common diet. Fifteen pigs were removed prior to FR due to enteric disease. On d 18, feed was removed from pigs on treatments 2 to 5 for 24 h. After 24 h, 8 pigs per treatment were harvested for tissue collection. Feed access was restored to the remaining pigs who were harvested 3 d later. Ileal samples were collected and immediately frozen. Plasma and fecal samples were collected upon arrival, at FR, and 24 h and 4-d post-FR. Ileal expression of claudin-3, occludin, and tight-junction-1 genes was determined using QuantStudio 3 Real Time PCR system. Fold-change in gene expression compared with NC was calculated for each treatment. Plasma samples were analyzed for LPS binding protein (LBP) concentration, and fecal samples were analyzed for myeloperoxidase (MPO) concentration. Pig (n = 75) was the experimental unit for BW, LBP, MPO, and gene expression data. Pen (n = 30) was the experimental unit for feed intake. Data were analyzed using PROC GLIMMIX of SAS. Preplanned orthogonal contrasts were performed to determine the effect of PC vs. 4 FR treatments. To determine the relationship of tight junction gene expression and LBP and MPO, PROC REG of SAS was used. Data are described as PC vs. FR treatments to focus on model development. Final BW for pigs on PC was greater compared with the FR treatments (P < 0.05; Table 1). From 1 to 4 d post-FR, average daily gain (ADG) for FR treatments was greater than PC (P < 0.01). There was no effect of treatment on feed intake or feed efficiency. Plasma LBP and fecal MPO concentrations were greater 24 h post-FR for pigs on PC compared with FR treatments (P < 0.01). Fold change in occludin and claudin-3 expression was greater for PC compared with FR treatments (P ≤ 0.05). For pigs euthanized 24 h post-FR, there was a positive relationship between LBP concentrations and occludin expression (P < 0.02). Twenty-four hour FR in weaned pigs alters ileal tight junction gene expression and plasma LBP concentrations; therefore, a timed FR event may serve as a model for leaky gut.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score0.312

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal ScienceSame topicBarrier Structure and Function StudiesFrench-language works237,207