MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396656514 · doi:10.31518/2618-9100-2024-2-11

From the History of Religious Quest of Russian Educated Society in the Second Quarter of the 19th Century: Leonilla Sayn-Wittgenstein

2024· article· en· W4396656514 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueHistorical Courier · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLiterature, Language, and Rhetoric Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProtestantismPoliticsReligious studiesQuarter (Canadian coin)Power (physics)State (computer science)PhilosophySociologyHistoryLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article endeavors to address in detail the religious quests of Leonilla Ivanovna Sayn-Wittgenstein (née Baryatinskaya, 1816-1918) -a famous secular lady and activist of the Catholic movement.The article analyses the religious way of life of the Baryatinsky family, where Sayn-Wittgenstein spent her childhood.It is concluded that Leonilla's childhood was spent in a polyconfessional, but mainly Orthodox and Protestant environment, Catholic influences were not particularly noticeable.Leonilla's gravitation towards Catholicism in her childhood was not the result of a worldview quest.Her childhood imagination was possessed by the image of a Catholic visionary nun like Teresa of Avila, with which she probably related herself.The article pays special attention to the period of L.I. Sayn-Wittgenstein's conversion to Catholicism, which fell on the first years of her married life.A previously unknown source -the characterisation of L.I. Sayn-Wittgenstein written by V.P. Davydov -is introduced into the scientific use.On the basis of its analysis the thesis is argued that Leonilla Ivanovna's worldview was greatly influenced by the liberal views of her husband, the Decembrist L.P. Wittgenstein.She decided to convert to Catholicism under the influence of a liberal political impulse, against the background of her rejection of violations of the principle of equal rights in the state and her rapprochement with the Polish-Lithuanian milieu.She perceived Catholicism from a "political" perspective, and her ecclesiology is closely linked to the problem of power.The question of what place L.I. Sayn-Wittgenstein took in the Catholic movement after her departure from Russia and her conversion to Catholicism on June, 21, 1847, is discussed.The history of her relations with Felix Dupanloup and other representatives of liberal Catholicism in France, whom she supported and called "the blessed cohort", is described.The position that L.I. Sayn-Wittgenstein occupied in the Catholic world and among the European aristocracy at the turn of the century is characterised.Her views on Russia, expressed in her correspondence with Count Dubassin de Richmond, are analyzed.It is concluded that L.I. Sayn-Wittgenstein was a supporter of the liberal evolution of the Russian political system, supported the programme of P.A. Stolypin and the Octobrists.It can be said that throughout her long life she maintained a consistent worldview -starting from the turn of the 1830s-1840s and until the end of her days she was committed to political Catholicism of the liberal direction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.824
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it