Current control for a supercapacitor-based battery equalization system
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a novel supercapacitor-based energy equalization system and discusses a new equalization current control method. The proposed battery equalization system is composed of a bidirectional boost–buck circuit, a switch matrix, and a supercapacitor, which can realize stable electric current transmission between batteries and supercapacitors. The buck or boost mode of the circuit is triggered automatically based on the threshold of the voltage drop between the battery and the supercapacitor. A modified control logic of the metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistor is proposed to improve the efficiency of the circuit, and a model predictive control (MPC) algorithm is designed to track the target current. Simulation results indicate that for a conventional electric current transmitting circuit, the current fluctuates violently under a fixed pulse width modulation duty. In contrast, the proposed supercapacitor-based energy equalization system tracks the target current well under the control of the MPC controller. In a wide operating range, the transmission efficiency of the new energy equalization system with the modified control logic is 13.0% higher than that of the conventional electric current transmitting circuit with the original control logic.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".