MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396658968 · doi:10.1079/hai.2024.0015

Exploring the role of service dogs for Canadian military Veterans experiencing suicidality

2024· article· en· W4396658968 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueHuman-Animal Interactions · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHuman-Animal Interaction Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersHealth Canada
KeywordsMilitary serviceService memberService (business)PsychologyPolitical scienceMedical emergencyAeronauticsMilitary personnelMedicinePsychiatryCriminologyEngineeringBusinessLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Despite ample anecdotal evidence, there are limited meaningful studies speaking to the important role of the human-animal bond (HAB) in reducing suicidality. However, research is increasingly showing the viability of service dogs (SDs) as a complementary approach for military Veterans suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and substance use harms – two of the strongest indicators of suicidality across any population. An original, exploratory study completed in 2020 focused on how SDs supported Canadian Veterans living with PTSD and substance use concerns. From this work, a secondary analysis was then undertaken: 28 transcripts were examined through thematic analysis to explore the experiences of the Veterans who were identified as being at high risk for suicide to better understand how SDs may assist with their suicidality. Our methodological approach for the secondary analysis employed affective coding to discover how the social support system enabled by the SDs reduced experiences of loneliness and hopelessness, as well as symptoms of PTSD, depression, and substance use concerns that are commonly associated with suicidality. The SDs were reported by the Veterans as being a catalyst in reducing self-harm and suicidality, as the HAB provided a unique and necessary form of social support for Veterans that was distinct from what other human-human interactions could provide. While acknowledgement of how context specificity and the lived experience of each individual remains crucial for making sense of suicidality, the significant finding from this research has been the identification of the critical impact that SDs have in the lives of Veterans when it comes to preventing suicide. The SD has been explained as a bridge to improve Veterans’ overall quality of life and reduce markers commonly recognized as precursors to suicide – a finding that may be critical in helping reduce future suicide risk among military Veterans, and warrants further investigation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.562
Threshold uncertainty score0.942

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it