Thickened Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Without Hypermyelination in Autosomal Recessive Spastic Ataxia of Charlevoix-Saguenay
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose: To report the retinal findings in a patient with autosomal recessive spastic ataxia of Charlevoix-Saguenay. Methods: A case was evaluated. Results: A 16-year-old male patient with a known diagnosis of autosomal recessive spastic ataxia of Charlevoix-Saguenay was referred for evaluation of retinal hypermyelination given its frequent association with the condition. The patient was asymptomatic with a best-corrected visual acuity of 20/20. Optical coherence tomography of the peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) showed bilateral thickening in each eye (average thicknesses: 180 µm, right eye; 177 µm, left eye). An examination showed no myelinization of the RNFL. Conclusions: Most studies to date describe RNFL thickening secondary to hypermyelination as a characteristic finding in autosomal recessive spastic ataxia of Charlevoix-Saguenay. This case provides evidence that this thickening may be a result of hypertrophy rather than hypermyelination. Further investigation is needed to define the pathophysiologic cause of RNFL thickening in autosomal recessive spastic ataxia of Charlevoix-Saguenay.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".