MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396665176 · doi:10.1021/acsami.4c02058

Thin Film Resistance Gating by Redox Charge Exchange: Evidence for a Quantum Transition State

2024· article· en· W4396665176 on OpenAlexafffund
Xiaoyang Chen, Al-Amin Dhirani

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMolecular Junctions and Nanostructures
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMaterials scienceThin filmChemical physicsNanotechnologyRedoxDensity functional theoryMoleculeOptoelectronicsComputational chemistryOrganic chemistryChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Field effect transistors (FETs) and related devices have enabled tremendous advances in electronics, as well as studies of fundamental phenomena. FETs are classically actuated as fields charge/discharge materials, thereby modifying their resistance. Here, we develop charge exchange transistors (CETs) that comprise thin films whose resistance is modified by quantum charge exchange processes, e.g., redox and bonding. We first use CETs to probe the metallocene-thin film interaction during cyclic voltammetry. Remarkably, CETs reveal transient resistance peaks associated with charge transfer during both oxidation and reduction. Our data combined with kinetics and density functional theory modeling are consistent with a multistep redox pathway, including the formation/destruction of a quantum transition state that overlaps molecule + thin film band states. As a further proof-of-principle demonstration, we also use CETs to monitor n -alkanethiol self-assembly on thin Au films in real-time. CETs exhibit monotonic resistance increase consistent with previously reported fast-then-slow kinetics attributed to thiol-thin film bond formation (charge localization) and etching and/or molecule reorganization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS Applied Materials & InterfacesSame topicMolecular Junctions and NanostructuresFrench-language works237,207