Le voyage d’Alice : un texte standardisé pour l’évaluation de la parole et de la voix en Français.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Reading passages allow the observation of target stimuli in a controlled manner while maximizing the ecological aspects of a speech and voice assessment. Objective: This article presents a new standardized reading passage titled “Le voyage d’Alice” (“Alice's Journey”) and an automated protocol for the extraction of acoustic measures. Methods: The passage was constructed using a comprehensive set of criteria, taking into account data from the literature, specific needs identified in scientific research and in French-speaking clinical practice, and data from an international consensus study. Results: This passage was found to be easy to read and usable for the assessment of articulation of speech sounds, prosodic variations and phonatory behavior, as well as fluency, in Belgium, France, and Canada. The automated acoustic feature extraction protocol allows for a quick and simple analysis of reproducible data. It is a tool adapted for both scientific research and daily clinical practice. Acoustic measures were extracted from the passage in healthy participants in France and are used as reference values.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".