MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396668060 · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2024.104554

Adverse Childhood Experiences Moderate the Relationship Between Pain and Later Suicidality Severity Among Youth: A Longitudinal High-Risk Cohort Study

2024· article· en· W4396668060 on OpenAlexafffund
Perri R. Tutelman, Mélanie Noël, Emily Bernier, Fiona Schulte, Daniel C. Kopala‐Sibley

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Pain · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicChild Abuse and Trauma
Canadian institutionsHotchkiss Brain InstituteOntario Brain InstituteAlberta Children's HospitalCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthUniversity of Calgary
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchBrain and Behavior Research Foundation
KeywordsAdverse Childhood ExperiencesLongitudinal studyNeglectCohortMental healthPsychiatryCohort studyMedicineSuicide preventionPsychologyClinical psychologyOccupational safety and healthPoison controlInjury preventionMedical emergencyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pain in adolescence can lead to the development of serious mental health issues, including suicidality. This risk may be strengthened among youth exposed to more adverse childhood experiences (ACEs; abuse, neglect, household challenges). This longitudinal study examined the role of ACEs in the relationship between pain and later suicidality onset and severity among a cohort of adolescents at risk for developing mental health problems. Participants were 139 healthy youth ( M age =13.74 years, SD =1.56, 64% female) between the ages of 11-17 years, recruited based on parental history of depression or anxiety. Youth completed validated measures of internalizing symptoms, ACEs, and pain characteristics at baseline and follow-up diagnostic interviews 9- and/or 18-months later to assess for onset and severity of suicidality. After controlling for demographics, baseline internalizing symptoms, and ACEs, worse pain interference and increased ACEs at baseline predicted increased suicidality severity at follow-up. Moderation analyses revealed that there was a significant interaction between ACEs and pain interference and pain intensity. Increased pain interference ( b = 7.65, p <.0001) or intensity ( b = 6.96, p =.0003) was only associated with increased suicidality severity at follow-up in youth with high levels of ACEs. This study demonstrates that ACEs strengthen the relationship between pain and later suicidality severity among youth at risk of developing mental health problems. Findings underscore the critical need to adopt a trauma informed lens to pediatric pain prevention and treatment (e.g., screening for ACEs), and for pain to be on the child mental health agenda. Perspective This article provides evidence that while pain is a risk factor for future increased suicidality severity, it is a particularly strong risk factor in youth who experienced increased childhood adversity. These results may help identify youth at greatest risk for suicidality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of PainSame topicChild Abuse and TraumaFrench-language works237,207