MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396669975 · doi:10.1103/physrevc.109.055201

Evaluation of the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math> ratio in the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>1232</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math> transition from the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>γ</mml:mi><mml:mo></mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo></mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>π</mml:mi><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math> reaction

2024· article· lv· W4396669975 on OpenAlexafffund
E. Mornacchi, P. Pedroni, F. Afzal, Y. Wunderlich, S. Abt, P. Achenbach, J. R. M. Annand, H. J. Arends, M. Bashkanov, M. Biroth, R. Beck, N. S. Borisov, A. Braghieri, W. J. Briscoe, F. Cividini, C. Collicott, A. G. Denig, А. С. Должиков, E. J. Downie, S. Fegan, A. Fix, D. Ghosal, I. Gorodnov, W. Gradl, G. G. Gurevich, L. Heijkenskjöld, D. Hornidge, G. M. Huber, V. L. Kashevarov, S. Kay, M. Korolija, A. B. Lazarev, K. Livingston, S. Lutterer, I. J. D. MacGregor, D. M. Manley, P. P. Martel, R. Miskimen, Mihai Mocanu, C. Mullen, A. Neganov, A. Neiser, M. Oberle, M. Ostrick, P. B. Otte, D. Paudyal, A. Powell, T. Rostomyan, V. Sokhoyan, K. Spieker, O. Steffen, I. I. Strakovsky, M. Thiel, A. Thomas, Yu. A. Usov, S. R. Wagner, D. P. Watts, D. Werthmüller, J. Wettig, L. Witthauer, M. Wolfes, N. Zachariou

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. C · 2024
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ReginaMount Allison University
FundersScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftU.S. Department of EnergySchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsNucleonProtonAmplitudeParticle physicsQuadrupoleMachine learningAlgorithmAtomic physicsNuclear physicsQuantum mechanicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The transition from the nucleon to the $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}}(1232)$ resonance is a sensitive test for models of the nucleon structure. A magnetic dipole ($M1$) quark spin-flip transition essentially dominates photoexcitation of the $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}}$, but smaller components in the nucleon and $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}}$ wave functions allow also electric quadrupole ($E2$) contributions. The ratio $E2/M1$ then provides fundamental information on both the spatial deformation of the nucleon or $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}}$, and on the corresponding $D$ states in their quark-model wave functions. The authors measured the $E2/M1$ ratio via single ${\ensuremath{\pi}}^{0}$ production from the proton with a circularly polarized photon beam and a longitudinally polarized proton target, exploiting the presence of interference terms between the measured amplitudes that enhance the effect of smaller contributions. This most precise experimental result to date for the $E2/M1$ ratio gives deep insight into the nucleon properties and provides a precision benchmark for all nonperturbative QCD models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.771
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0060.011
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.013
Bibliometrics0.0030.008
Science and technology studies0.0100.009
Scholarly communication0.0100.010
Open science0.0130.010
Research integrity0.0110.012
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2490.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. CSame topicQuantum Chromodynamics and Particle InteractionsFrench-language works237,207