Re-Connecting the Humber River Through Design-Based Research Solutions in Planning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The watercourses of the Humber River Watershed have influenced pollinator paths, trails, and roads from the Niagara Escarpment and the Oak Ridges Moraine downward towards Lake Ontario. The Carrying Place, an Indigenous trail and portage route, is a manifestation of the Humber River. However, over the past centuries, as Western land-development and infrastructure practices were implemented, the Carrying Place Trail slowly disappeared (Turner, 2015). Fractured remnants of the Indigenous route have influenced the contemporary trail system of the Humber River Watershed. The Watershed is a significant cultural landscape, however, due to the cross-jurisdictional nature of the Watershed, the cultural, abiotic, and biotic layers of the landscape are acknowledged differently by each Municipality within its boundary. Through design-based research, the Major Research Project intends to re-connect fragmented sections of the Humber River Watershed’s existing trail system to celebrate the cultural and natural heritage of the watercourses through time and space.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.028 | 0.026 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.017 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.015 | 0.011 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".