MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396677783 · doi:10.1080/17480930.2024.2348877

Machine learning with SHapley additive exPlanations for evaluating mine truck productivity under real-site weather conditions at varying temporal resolutions

2024· article· en· W4396677783 on OpenAlexaff
Chengkai Fan, Chathuranga Balasooriya Arachchilage, Na Zhang, Bei Jiang, Wei Victor Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Mining Reclamation and Environment · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMining Techniques and Economics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTruckProductivityWind speedTurbineComputer scienceRandom forestEnvironmental scienceMeteorologyEngineeringAutomotive engineeringMachine learningGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The updated abstract, shortened to about 100 words, is shown below: This study built truck productivity prediction models incorporating real-site weather conditions at varying temporal resolutions. The best models were combined with SHapley Additive exPlanations to offer quantitative and qualitative analysis for input variables’ effect on the model outputs. The results showed that mining engineers can make more accurate predictions of truck productivity at the weekly resolution compared with other resolutions. The three most influential input parameters were haul distance, empty speed, and ambient temperature. Extreme weather, such as strong wind speed, heavy precipitation, and extreme relative humidity, had a certain effect on truck-shovel allocation. Meanwhile, a unified graphical user interface was developed to predict mine truck productivity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.438

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Mining Reclamation and EnvironmentSame topicMining Techniques and EconomicsFrench-language works237,207