Assessment of Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms in Dementia, Associated Risk Factors and Clinical Correlates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: The presence of behavioral and psychological symptoms in dementia (BPSD) are associated with hospitalization, rapid cognitive decline, poor quality of life and higher caregiver burden. Thus, we aim to characterize the BPSD symptoms, its relationship to dementia-related risk factors and their predictive value, if any.Methodology: In 48 adults (mean age: 70.27 ± 10.08) with major neurocognitive disorder (MNCD) as per diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 5th edition and with Hindi mental status examination scores less than or equal to 23 were recruited. Patients were assessed for cognition by hindi Montreal cognitive assessment (HMOCA) and the clinical dementia rating scale (CDR). BPSD and caregiver burden were assessed using the neuropsychiatric inventory (NPI) and burden assessment schedule (BAS). The correlation of NPI scores with socio-demographic variables and clinical variables was assessed. A forward stepwise linear regression (using p-value < .05) was used to identify possible predictors of the NPI scores.Results: The majority of participants were predominantly males, 25 (52.1%), from urban regions, belonged to middle-class socio-economic status and had severe grading (HMOCA (< 10) of MNCD (25 (52.2%) but had moderate caregiver burden (25 (52.2%)). The most common MNCD type was due to Alzheimer’s disease (22 (45.8%)). Cortical atrophy and ischemic infarcts were the most common neuroimaging abnormalities reported (7 (14.9%)). Mean HMOCA, clinical dementia rating scale (CDR), NPI and BAS scores were 9.13 ± 6.96, 1.50 ± 1.05, 41.79 ± 27.06 and 68.65 ± 22.84, respectively. The most common BPSD domains were sleep disturbance (60.4%) and hallucinations (56.25%). Among the established risk factors, hypertension was present in the highest proportion (21 (43.8%)). As per the stepwise logistic regression model CDR scores, smoking status and HTN were predicted risk factors (R²: 0.452; p = 0.045).Conclusion: Irritability/agitation is most prevalent BPSD. The severity of MNCD, smoking and hypertension may help in the prediction of BPSD and their role may have to be explored in further studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".