MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396683973 · doi:10.59403/44r9b3004

Chapter 4 Australia

2011· book-chapter· en· W4396683973 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Reynah Tang, Don Spirason

Bibliographic record

VenueIBFD eBooks · 2011
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicTaxation and Legal Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Why this book? Transfer Pricing and Dispute Resolution addresses the complexity, valuation and administrative nuances, and cultural impacts of resolving this significant cross-border issue when tax disputes arise. In recent years, transfer pricing has become in financial terms the most important tax issue faced by multinational companies and tax authorities worldwide. In times of economic downturn, as experienced in recent years, when tax authorities are challenged for revenue, the handling of these issues requires great care, skill, creativity and a true awareness of the ramifications confronting each tax jurisdiction. This book sets out in detail not only the general laws in each tax jurisdiction impacted by the multinational companies’ transfer pricing practices, but also the ancillary concerns of how the issue is interpreted locally as well as related to the OECD Guidelines; the varied approaches to administrative resolution of these issues, including specific alternative dispute resolution mechanisms and the effective uses of Advance Pricing Agreements; correlative adjustment procedures in the event of transfer pricing adjustments; cross-border exchange of information concerns; and how to proceed to litigation if all else fails administratively. It is here that the book delves into the specific procedures for litigation in each country which must be evaluated as part of the overall strategy for controversy resolution. Unfortunately, today litigation is on the rise in numerous jurisdictions and the presumption of an administrative resolution is no longer correct. An additional feature of this book is how practical anecdotes are intertwined into the analysis to give the reader a sense of pragmatism for these issues. To this point, there are the various case studies which highlight the technicalities of the local rules, customs, and practices. From these case studies, the reader can truly glean a sense of how a strategy for resolution can be formalized and possibly play itself out. Downloads Sample excerpt, including table of contents Benefits Transfer Pricing and Dispute Resolution is an essential tool for assisting the tax practitioner in all facets of transfer pricing, but most prominently in establishing a strategy for a multinational company’s transfer pricing policy and documentation which will be the prime consideration in a tax controversy. If properly prepared and implemented, the ultimate strategy to resolve local or multi-country tax controversies has a greater chance of success. Guidelines set forth in this book are therefore a resource. Countries/Jurisdictions covered Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Japan, Mexico, Netherlands, South Africa, United Kingdom, United States. Contents Foreword Introduction Dispute Channels International Developments Country chapters (incl. case study) Editor(s) Anuschka Bakker is Chief Editor Topicals of IBFD's Knowledge Center, where she has overall responsibility for IBFD's publications on transfer pricing, permanent establishments, holding companies, mergers & acquisitions and derivatives and financial instruments. Ms Bakker is both an avid writer and editor (Tax Risk Management, Transfer Pricing and Business Restructuring, Transfer Pricing and Customs Valuation, Transfer Pricing and Dispute Resolution). She is also involved in lecturing in the above-mentioned fields. Marc M. Levey is the past Chair of Baker & McKenzie's Global Transfer Pricing Steering Committee, and co-Chair of the Fashion and Luxury Goods Practice Group. With over 30 years of experience in international taxation, he is recognized as one of the world's leading tax advisors and transfer pricing experts. Mr Levey is the author of numerous publications and is a prolific speaker at international tax events worldwide. Contributor(s) Suzan Arendsen, Cheng Chi, Murray Clayson, Philip Croall, Moisés Curiel García, Harald Dols, David Francescucci, Bruno Gibert, Monique van Herksen, Lawrence M. Hill, Wally Horak, Shiraj Keshvani, Johan Kotze, Roman Lang, Ho Yin Leung, Toshio Miyatake, Marcelo Natale, Rajendra Nayak, Carlos Nicacio, Srinivasa Rao, Christian Reichardt, H. David Rosenbloom, Don Spirason, Eduard Sporken, Werner Stuffer, Reynah Tang, Jeannette van der Vegt, Steven C. Wrappe

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.915
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.018

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.156 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIBFD eBooksSame topicTaxation and Legal IssuesFrench-language works237,207