Polarization-controlled unidirectional lattice plasmon modes via a multipolar plasmonic metasurface
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Diffractive plasmonic metasurfaces offer the possibility of controlling the flow of light in flat optical systems through the excitation of lattice plasmon modes by a careful metasurface design. Nonetheless, a remaining challenge for this type of structure is the dynamic control of its optical properties via degrees of freedom, such as the polarization states of incoming light. In this report, we explain theoretically and demonstrate experimentally the polarization control over amplitude and propagation direction of lattice plasmon modes supported by a multipolar plasmonic metasurface. These unidirectional optical waves result from the coupling between near-field effects of individual meta-atoms and far-field effects originating from the lattice modes. The device operates over a broad wavelength range, maintaining its directional behavior and enabling it to operate also as a polarization-controlled directional diffraction grating, a power splitter, or an optical router for on-chip photonics applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".