KubePlaybook: A Repository of Ansible Playbooks for Kubernetes Auto-Remediation with LLMs
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the evolving landscape of software development and system operations, the demand for automating traditionally manual tasks has surged. Continuous operation and minimal downtimes highlight the need for automated detection and remediation of runtime anomalies. Ansible, known for its scalable features, including high-level abstraction and modularity, stands out as a reliable solution for managing complex systems securely. The challenge lies in creating an on-the-spot Ansible solution for dynamic auto-remediation, requiring a substantial dataset for in-context tuning of large language models (LLMs). Our research introduces KubePlaybook, a curated dataset with 130 natural language prompts for generating automation-focused remediation code scripts. After rigorous manual testing, the generated code achieved an impressive 98.86% accuracy rate, affirming the solution's reliability and performance in addressing dynamic auto-remediation complexities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it