A novel intervention effect-based quadratic time-varying nonlinear discrete grey model for forecasting carbon emissions intensity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the context of severe global warming, accurately exploring the trend of carbon emissions intensity (CEI) changes is of great significance for mitigating climate change issues. The implementation of China's Carbon Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) in 2013 is a policy intervention aimed at influencing CEI. The impact of intervention events makes forecasting a complex problem, which poses significant challenges to the construction of forecasting models. We first develop a quadratic time-varying nonlinear discrete grey model (QDNDGM(1,1)) to assess the intervention effect of the ETS policy. Then, a novel intervention effect-based quadratic time-varying nonlinear discrete grey model (IE-QDNDGM(1,1)) is developed to conduct the prediction under intervention effect, including an intervention term. The Whale Optimization Algorithm (WOA) is used to calculate a nonlinear parameter. We assess the intervention effect of the ETS policy in China and find that it can indeed reduce CEI. We verify the IE-QDNDGM(1,1) model’s superiority by comparing its predictive performance with that of three grey models, one statistical technique, and one artificial intelligence model. The comparative study shows the proposed model’s excellent fitting and prediction performance. An ablation experiment is conducted to validate the design of the IE-QDNDGM(1,1). Policy implications of the ETS intervention effect are discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".