MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396693517 · doi:10.11647/obp.0371.20

20. Intimacy with Jesus

2024· book-chapter· en· W4396693517 on OpenAlexaff
Luke Clossey

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Book Publishers · 2024
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicBiblical Studies and Interpretation
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyArtSociologyHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Three groups of Jesus cultists who made use of both kens to move themselves even closer to him, achieving a kind of intimacy that could become domestic and even sexual. We begin with a group of female mystics, from England to Ethiopia, who cultivated extraordinary marital relationships with Jesus. Second, the participants in the Modern Devotion lived in regulated communities, sometimes involving spiritual nudity and marriage alongside more modest activities like yarn-spinning and prayer. Finally, Hafiz of Shiraz and other Muslim poets (Mahmud Pasha Angelović, Mehmed II, Isa Necati, Qāsim-i Anwār, Mahmoud Shabestari) spun lyrics celebrating comely boys bearing stupor-inducing wine and life-giving Jesus-breath.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.446
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0100.003
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0660.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Book PublishersSame topicBiblical Studies and InterpretationFrench-language works237,207