Status of Boyden observatory and equipment for optical counterpart studies of high energy sources
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The status of the Boyden observatory and equipment will be evaluated for use in optical counterpart studies of high energy sources. Optical systems include the 1.5~m Boyden telescope which has recently received system and equipment upgrades to the photometer, specifically a new sCMOS camera system. Additionally a state of the art spectro-polarimeter has been commissioned and is in final testing and initial observing phases. Besides the 1.5~m telescope, there is also robotic telescope systems, e.g. Watcher and BOOTES-6. Watcher, was primarily for follow-up of gamma ray bursts, but has also been used for optical counterpart and survey studies, and target-of-opportunity events. BOOTES-6, or Burst Observer and Optical Transient Exploring System, is a new telescope system that allows for much faster target acquisition for Gamma-ray bursts events, but is also available for optical studies of transient phenomena or optical counterpart studies. With these optical systems, various multi-wavelength studies and collaborative efforts are envisioned for the Observatory
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.028 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".