MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396697861 · doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202452301008

“En-Solex”: A Novel Solar Exoskeleton for the Energy-efficiency Retrofitting of Existing Buildings

2024· article· en· W4396697861 on OpenAlexaff
Roberto Stasi, F. Ruggiero, Umberto Berardi

Bibliographic record

VenueE3S Web of Conferences · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBuilding Energy and Comfort Optimization
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersRegione Puglia
KeywordsRetrofittingExoskeletonArchitectural engineeringComputer scienceEnvironmental scienceEngineeringStructural engineeringSimulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The energy retrofitting of the existing building stock is one of the current challenging strategic objectives on the way to the European target of climate neutrality by 2050. According to the Renovation Wave plan, around 35 million existing buildings need to be upgraded to the highest energy efficiency level by 2030, and innovative technological solutions are required to achieve this ambitious goal. This paper proposes a novel solar exoskeleton for the energy and architectural retrofitting of existing buildings, called En-Solex. The system, which consists of an external steel frame that wraps around buildings like a double skin, combines passive solar gain control (shading and greening) with high-efficiency active solar systems (PV panels) optimised for integration into existing building facades. The energy-saving potential of the system with different façade configurations is evaluated on a multi-family residential building located in a Mediterranean climate. The dynamic energy simulations show that the proposed solution can reduce the energy demand for space heating and cooling by 33.4% and 25.5% respectively. The En-Solex system integration combined with generator replacement results in a maximum heating and cooling reduction equal to 80.7% and 59.6% respectively. The surplus of electricity generated, thanks to the integration of RES, can lead to a net plus target, with the building exceeding its average annual electricity demand.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueE3S Web of ConferencesSame topicBuilding Energy and Comfort OptimizationFrench-language works237,207