Effective fracture placement using alternate fracturing
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Alternate (Out-Of-Sequence) Pinpoint Fracturing has been tested in Western Siberia and Western Canada. It aims to create fracture complexity via reducing the stress anisotropy to improve fracture network connectivity. It is initiated by fracturing Stages 1 and then 3 (Outside Fracs) followed by Stage 2 (Centre Frac). A fracture model is calibrated using Alternate Pinpoint Fracturing trials in Western Canada. The calibrated fracture model is used to evaluate Alternate Pinpoint Fracturing under various geomechanical and treatment conditions for identifying strategies in maximising its benefits. This integrated geomechanical study reveals that: (1) Centre Fracs tend to have a larger surface area and smaller conductivity versus Outside Fracs, (2) Centre Fracs tend to be narrower and shorter (versus Outside Fracs) if sufficient out-of-zone growth is attained in the absence of strong fracture height containment, making it an option for penetrating multi-stacked zones in one treatment, and (3) Where Centre Fracs are shorter or near-well fracture complexity is generated, it can be considered in treating the child wells to reduce frac hits.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it