MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396701121 · doi:10.11159/iceptp24.167

Impact of Stormwater Runoff on the Water Quality of Lakes in a Metropolitan Region in India

2024· article· en· W4396701121 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jyoti Mishra, V.S. Vamsi Botlaguduru

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the World Congress on Civil, Structural, and Environmental Engineering · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicGroundwater and Watershed Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSurface runoffMetropolitan areaStormwaterWater qualityEnvironmental scienceHydrology (agriculture)Water resource managementGeographyGeologyGeotechnical engineeringEcologyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pollutants originate in stormwater runoff from natural and anthropogenic activities in the urban watershed.In metropolitan areas, runoff is a significant contributor to non-point source pollution [1].Emerging contaminants are synthetic substances not commonly monitored in developing countries and have become an environmental concern due to their potential adverse effects on human health and ecosystems [2].This research aims to characterize the runoff in the Powai region of Mumbai, India and identify the potential sources of pollutants entering the Powai lake.The focus of the current work is on heavy metals and emerging contaminants.Runoff samples were collected from five different outfall locations in the region (SL1, SL2, SL3, SL4, and SL5) for ten storm events between the 2022 and 2023 monsoon seasons.The analysis of runoff samples revealed elevated concentrations of aluminum, lead, iron, nickel, manganese and chromium.In addition, trace levels of copper and zinc were detected for both the monsoon season.Vehicular sources were identified as probable sources of iron, lead, nickel, and aluminum.Construction activity and leaching from building materials were identified as likely sources of chromium.Phthalates, pesticides, personal care products and pharmaceuticals were the four classes of emerging contaminants detected in the runoff across the five locations.The following phthalate compounds, typically originating from microplastics: Di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), Decyl hexyl phthalate, Diisooctyl phthalate, Octyl decyl phthalate, Bis(3,5,5trimethylhexyl) phthalate, Bis(2-ethylhexyl) isophthalate, Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate, Dibutyl phthalate, Diethyl phthalate, Dimethyl phthalate and Dioctyl phthalate (DOP) were the most abundant phthalate esters.The study estimates PVC pipes, vinyl flooring, medical devices, and consumer-use plastics as the potential sources of phthalates.Diuron and Isoxaben, commonly used as herbicides, were prevalent across the sampling locations.The outfall locations SL1 and SL4, which convey runoff from varied catchments, indicated the presence of carbendazim, a fungicide that can migrate from urban green spaces.Zearalenone, a mycotoxin produced by certain fungi of the Fusarium genus, was detected for the 2022 monsoon seasons.Diflufenican, a commonly used herbicide for weed control in lawns, gardens, paints, and roof coatings, was also detected.Pharmaceutical and Personal care products (PPCPs) such as ethyl paraben, galaxolidone, enalapril, norgestrel, caffeine, metformin, and valsartan were detected and quantified.Research is underway to identify the probable sources of these PPCPs and elaborate on their fate and transport.Preliminary findings indicate that the mixing of untreated sewage and the presence of healthcare facilities in the region could be contributing to the detected PPCPs.The depleted levels of dissolved oxygen and higher fecal coliform counts observed at the outfall locations (SL1 and SL3) further confirm the hypothesis of sewage mixture with runoff.The findings of this study could be used as a reference to assess the impact of runoff on the degrading water quality of Powai Lake.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.206
Threshold uncertainty score0.355

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the World Congress on Civil, Structural, and Environmental EngineeringSame topicGroundwater and Watershed AnalysisFrench-language works237,207