Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ever since his own time, Nicholas of Cusa has been seen as a thinker caught between medieval and modern. Unsurprisingly, he was also caught between the deep and plain kens, and in Jesus found an escape. The chapter begins with two concrete examples: Cusa's invention of a “new and fun game” of curling based on Jesus's life, which contrasted an irregular ball thrown at concentric perfect circles, and an optical illusion of Jesus which contrasted God's perfect vision with human vision in spacetime. The chapter then follows Cusa into greater abstraction. Jesus embodies plain-ken multiplicity with deep-ken oneness, and becomes himself the limit of the human intellect. Cusa argued for that Jesus-centred oneness while working to unify Christianity internally, as well as with Islam, based on his new reading of the Qur'an, which—for all his skepticism—he believed he understood better than the Muslims.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.053 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it