Unsupervised MRI motion artifact disentanglement: introducing MAUDGAN
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Objective. This study developed an unsupervised motion artifact reduction method for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images of patients with brain tumors. The proposed novel design uses multi-parametric multicenter contrast-enhanced T1W (ceT1W) and T2-FLAIR MRI images. Approach. The proposed framework included two generators, two discriminators, and two feature extractor networks. A 3-fold cross-validation was used to train and fine-tune the hyperparameters of the proposed model using 230 brain MRI images with tumors, which were then tested on 148 patients’ in-vivo datasets. An ablation was performed to evaluate the model’s compartments. Our model was compared with Pix2pix and CycleGAN. Six evaluation metrics were reported, including normalized mean squared error (NMSE), structural similarity index (SSIM), multi-scale-SSIM (MS-SSIM), peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), visual information fidelity (VIF), and multi-scale gradient magnitude similarity deviation (MS-GMSD). Artifact reduction and consistency of tumor regions, image contrast, and sharpness were evaluated by three evaluators using Likert scales and compared with ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD tests. Main results. On average, our method outperforms comparative models to remove heavy motion artifacts with the lowest NMSE (18.34±5.07%) and MS-GMSD (0.07 ± 0.03) for heavy motion artifact level. Additionally, our method creates motion-free images with the highest SSIM (0.93 ± 0.04), PSNR (30.63 ± 4.96), and VIF (0.45 ± 0.05) values, along with comparable MS-SSIM (0.96 ± 0.31). Similarly, our method outperformed comparative models in removing in-vivo motion artifacts for different distortion levels except for MS- SSIM and VIF, which have comparable performance with CycleGAN. Moreover, our method had a consistent performance for different artifact levels. For the heavy level of motion artifacts, our method got the highest Likert scores of 2.82 ± 0.52, 1.88 ± 0.71, and 1.02 ± 0.14 (p-values ≪ 0.0001) for our method, CycleGAN, and Pix2pix respectively. Similar trends were also found for other motion artifact levels. Significance. Our proposed unsupervised method was demonstrated to reduce motion artifacts from the ceT1W brain images under a multi-parametric framework.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".