MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396709484 · doi:10.1145/3629527.3651842

Network Analysis of Microservices: A Case Study on Alibaba Production Clusters

2024· article· en· W4396709484 on OpenAlex
Ghazal Khodabandeh, Alireza Ezaz, Naser Ezzati‐Jivan

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware System Performance and Reliability
Canadian institutionsBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicroservicesComputer scienceService (business)Cluster analysisProduction (economics)Distributed computingArtificial intelligenceCloud computingMarketingBusinessOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Having an observation of the microservices connections complexities within a service is essential for system management and optimization. In this study, we analyzed a dataset of microservice traces from Alibaba's production clusters, segmenting call graphs based on services. Using a community detection model, we uncovered the connections between microservices within each service by finding collaborative patterns and dependencies. Expanding our analysis, we identified similarities among service graphs using clustering techniques. These findings provide detailed insights for system optimization and decision-making, offering a roadmap for using the constructed runtime microservices network behavior to improve overall system efficiency and performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.641
Threshold uncertainty score0.272

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it