MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396710054 · doi:10.1353/ajs.2024.a926078

Behind the Glass: The Villa Tugendhat and Its Family by Michael Lambek (review)

2024· article· en· W4396710054 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Andrew Brandel

Bibliographic record

VenueAJS Review The Journal of the Association for Jewish Studies · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMemory, Trauma, and Commemoration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Behind the Glass: The Villa Tugendhat and Its Family by Michael Lambek Andrew Brandel Michael Lambek. Behind the Glass: The Villa Tugendhat and Its Family. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2022. 384 pp. Commissioned in 1928 in the city of Brno, seized by Nazi authorities in 1939, relinquished by the family who built it to the city 1969, and declared a UNESCO World Heritage site in 2001, the house that stands at the center of Behind the Glass has been a main character in films and novels, welcomed world-famous intellectuals, and set the stage for major political events. It is also a remarkable family's house. In crisp prose full of erudition, Michael Lambek, whose grandmother Grete owned and lived in the Villa Tugendhat, tells the story of the family who inhabited the house and who appear as characters (sometimes as themselves, sometimes fictionalized) in the stories told about it. But unlike most of what has been written about the Tugendhats' house so far, Behind the Glass foregrounds the lives of these characters themselves—their struggles, their relationships, their contributions—and ultimately offers a profound meditation on what it means to be part of a family. A celebrated anthropologist whose research has spanned issues of religion, memory, kinship, ethics, and the body, Lambek weaves elements drawn from an impressive range of sources into an original tapestry, one that shows the family and their worlds with a deep and abiding respect for their complexity. Over the course of seventeen chapters, he also thinks aloud about his own relationship to their intellectual legacy, the challenges their philosophical and artistic predilections offer his own aesthetic, ethical, and conceptual commitments, the frequency with which certain complexes seem to reproduce themselves across generations (not least, the tendency to idealize [End Page 233] particular members), and their involvement with historical figures like Mies van der Rohe and Martin Heidegger. Among the book's most important contributions is the multifaceted approach it adopts. The first two chapters of the book (part 1) together ask how one tells the story of a family and what sort of genres of knowledge are required. They relay not only the impetus for the project, but its false starts and difficulties. Lambek describes his account as belonging to a "blurred" genre, one with both objective and subjective aspirations and features. It is part memoir, he writes, insofar as it draws on memories (a selection of his own and those of other family members). But it is also what he calls an "anti-memoir," since the work that underlies the account is premised on "catching up" with the family about things he never knew. It is part ethnography, understood here as a "method that is no method, but rather a sustained, if temporary, being with others and a particular focus of attention" (26). And it is a social history, in that it provides a glimpse of a "broader" historical context by means of one family, though it does not pretend to be exhaustive about its sources, or impartial. It is equally fascinating to see when and how these shifts in genre occur: when, for example, the disclosure of an anxiety gives way to kinship charts and official records, or where a photograph triggers a long-suppressed memory. Part 2 starts not from the memories of living family members, but from the point of view of a "founding ancestor," Moses Löw-Beer, and proceeds forward in time. If one way to define a family is through property relations (i.e., as a legal unit with certain claims to an estate or holding and rules governing membership and descent), Lambek argues that this view is especially salient in the early days of the family Moses began. The relocation of the family from the ghetto in the small town of Bokskovice to Brno and then to Vienna after the First World War tracked with ever-changing legal regimes and restrictions set upon Jews in the region, as well as with their financial fortunes. An industrial capitalist, Moses founded a textile firm that expanded considerably over the next two generations, and relied on several bourgeois marriage alliances—a process Lambek painstakingly tracks through...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.112
Threshold uncertainty score0.479

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAJS Review The Journal of the Association for Jewish StudiesSame topicMemory, Trauma, and CommemorationFrench-language works237,207