MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4396710636 · doi:10.1109/icicv62344.2024.00028

Discovering Knee Osteoarthritis Using CNN Enhanced with AlexNet

2024· article· en· W4396710636 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Seethala Devi Chandu, P. Revathi, N. Vinoth

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWOMACOsteoarthritisGaitPhysical therapyRegression analysisPhysical medicine and rehabilitationLinear regressionConvolutional neural networkArtificial intelligenceGait analysisMedicineComputer scienceMachine learningPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pain and a decline in gait function are symptoms of knee osteoarthritis (KOA). With the use of machine learning methods, developed regression models to identify KOA-related gait variables according to outcome measurements (PROMS) that the patient reports. 375 people with a range of KOA scores took part in the study. Making use of the McMaster Universities and Western Ontario Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), the severity of KOA was assessed. The severity of the diseases was divided into three groups based on WOMAC scores. From the gait data, 1087 characteristics in total were retrieved. After doing an ANOVA and student's t-test, the machine learning system selected only significant features. Each of the three subscales of the WOMAC: stiffness, discomfort, and physical function has three categories. To ascertain which chosen traits were substantially correlated with the subscales, an ANOVA was conducted. To estimate the patient's WOMAC values, a random forest regression as well as linear regression models were utilized. Based on the outcomes of the student t-test and ANOVA, 43 characteristics were chosen. Twelve characteristics from the hip, one from the pelvis, seventeen from the foot, three from the spatiotemporal characteristics, nine from the knee, and one from the ankle were chosen from each joint. This research proposed a novel approach utilizing Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) with the AlexNet architecture to enhance the diagnostic accuracy and severity assessment of knee osteoarthritis. The study leverages a large dataset of knee radiographic images, encompassing diverse cases of OA progression. The AlexNet architecture, renowned for its deep learning capabilities in image classification tasks, is employed to automatically extract hierarchical features from the input radiographs. The CNN model is trained to discern subtle patterns and nuanced information indicative of OA-related structural changes, enabling it to differentiate between varying stages of the disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→