MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396717499 · doi:10.29173/mlj977

A Walking Contradiction: A Review of Canadian Maverick: The Life and Times of Ivan C. Rand

2017· review· en· W4396717499 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Darcy L. MacPherson

Bibliographic record

VenueManitoba Law Journal · 2017
Typereview
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContradictionPsychoanalysisGerontologyPsychologyHistoryPhilosophyMedicineEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research paper looks at the judicial decisions in Canada including R v Butler, R v Labaye, and R v Sharpe to trace the court's evolving attitudes on obscenity.Specifically, this paper discusses visual arts in relation to censorship, obscenity, and pornography.The purpose of this paper is to show that the obscenity law restricts artistic freedom by requiring an unsubstantiated risk of harm.Consequently, this paper takes an anticensorship feminist approach arguing there is profound educational value to be had in allowing artists to depict morally taboo subject matter.With this in mind, this paper offers a policy recommendation to eliminate the law of obscenity and indecency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.943
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueManitoba Law JournalSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207