Diagnostic Tool for Early Detection of Rheumatic Disorders Using Machine Learning Algorithm and Predictive Models
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Rheumatic diseases are chronic diseases that affect joints, tendons, ligaments, bones, muscles, and other vital organs. Detection of rheumatic diseases is a complex process that requires careful analysis of heterogeneous content from clinical examinations, patient history, and laboratory investigations. Machine learning techniques have made it possible to integrate such techniques into the complex diagnostic process to identify inherent features that lead to disease formation, development, and progression for remedial measures. Methods: An automated diagnostic tool using a multilayer neural network computational engine is presented to detect rheumatic disorders and the type of underlying disorder for therapeutic strategies. Rheumatic disorders considered are rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, and systemic lupus erythematosus. The detection system was trained and tested using 70% and 30% respectively of labelled synthetic dataset of 100,000 records containing both single and multiple disorders. Results: The detection system was able to detect and predict underlying disorders with accuracy of 97.48%, sensitivity of 96.80%, and specificity of 97.50%. Conclusion: The good performance suggests that this solution is robust enough and can be implemented for screening patients for intervention measures. This is a much-needed solution in environments with limited specialists, as the solution promotes task-shifting from the specialist level to the primary healthcare physicians.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".