MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4396722162 · doi:10.1101/2024.05.06.592814

Protection against <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> disease by a naturally avirulent <i>C. difficile</i> strain

2024· preprint· en· W4396722162 on OpenAlexaff
Qiwen Dong, S.R. Harper, Emma McSpadden, Sophie S Son, Marie-Maude Allen, Huaiying Lin, Rita C. Smith, Carolyn Metcalfe, Victoria Burgo, Che Woodson, Anitha Sundararajan, Amber R. Rose, Mary McMillin, David Morán, Jessica Little, Michael W. Mullowney, Ashley M. Sidebottom, Aimee Shen, Louis‐Charles Fortier, Eric G. Pamer

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersNational Institutes of HealthUniversity of Chicago
KeywordsVirulenceMicrobiologyStrain (injury)Clostridium difficileBiologyToxinPlasmidClostridium difficile toxin BClostridium difficile toxin AVirologyGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Clostridioides difficile (C. difficile) strains belonging to the epidemic BI/NAP1/027 (RT027) group have been associated with increased transmissibility and disease severity. In addition to the major toxin A and toxin B virulence factors, RT027 strains also encode the CDT binary toxin. Our lab previously identified a toxigenic RT027 isolate, ST1-75, that is avirulent in mice despite densely colonizing the colon. Here, we show that co-infecting mice with the avirulent ST1-75 and virulent R20291 strains protects mice from colitis due to rapid clearance of the virulent strain and persistence of the avirulent strain. Although avirulence of ST1-75 is due to a mutation in the cdtR gene, which encodes a response regulator that modulates the production of all three C. difficile toxins, the ability of ST1-75 to protect against acute colitis is not directly attributable to the cdtR mutation. Metabolomic analyses indicate that the ST1-75 strain depletes amino acids more rapidly than the R20291 strain and supplementation with amino acids ablates ST1-75’s competitive advantage, suggesting that the ST1-75 strain limits the growth of virulent R20291 bacteria by amino acid depletion. Since the germination kinetics and sensitivity to the co-germinant glycine are similar for the ST1-75 and R20291 strains, our results identify the rapidity of in vivo nutrient depletion as a mechanism providing strain-specific, virulence-independent competitive advantages to different BI/NAP1/027 strains. They also suggest that the ST1-75 strain may, as a biotherapeutic agent, enhance resistance to CDI in high-risk patients. Importance Clostridioides difficile infections (CDI) are prevalent in healthcare settings and are associated with high recurrence rates. Therapies to prevent CDI, including recent FDA-approved live biotherapeutic products, are costly and have not been used to prevent primary infections. While a nontoxigenic C. difficile strain (NTCD-M3) protects against virulent CDI in animals and reduced CDI recurrence in a phase 2 clinical trial, protection against CDI recurrence in humans was variable and required high doses of the nontoxigenic strain. Here we show that an avirulent C. difficile isolate, ST1-75, efficiently outcompetes virulent C. difficile strains in mice when co-infected at a 1:1 ratio. Our data suggest that inter-strain competition results from ST1-75’s more rapid depletion of amino acids than the virulent R20291 strain. Our study identifies inter-strain nutrient depletion as a potentially exploitable mechanism to reduce the incidence of CDI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research→French-language works237,207→