A cash transfer plus gender transformative economic empowerment intervention seeking to improve the wellbeing of caregivers of children and adolescents living with HIV in South Africa: a feasibility study protocol for a pilot cluster randomised trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background In sub-Saharan Africa, HIV care is dependent on informal caregiving, typically by female family members. Informal caregiving has been associated with numerous negative effects on caregivers (i.e. depression, intimate partner violence (IPV), financial insecurity). These factors impact both caregivers’ ability to provide care and their own wellbeing. South Africa is home to approximately 17% of the world’s children and adolescents living with HIV (CALHIV), making the development of initiatives that mitigates the negative effects of caregiving critical. This protocol details the design of a cluster randomised trial seeking to assess the feasibility, preliminary effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and acceptability of a cash transfer plus gender transformative economic empowerment intervention for improving psychological wellbeing, depressive symptoms, gender equality, and economic outcomes of caregivers of CALHIV.Methods Caregivers of CALHIV will be recruited from public sector HIV clinics within the eThekwini municipality, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Clusters will be randomly assigned to the intervention or control groups. Participants in the intervention arm (n = 120) will receive cash transfers (ZAR350, USD $18,79) and enrol in a programme (10 workshop sessions) over a 6-month period. Participants in the control arm (n = 120) will receive a monthly cash transfer (ZAR350, USD $18,79) for a 6-month period and a once-off standard mobile message at the beginning of the trial, encouraging linkage to healthcare services. Participants will be interviewed at baseline and endline, at the 7-month mark, to collect socio-demographic, health and wellbeing status, IPV, costs and earnings, and food security data. The primary outcomes (psychological wellbeing, depressive symptoms, IPV) will be measured using the Mental Health Continuum Short Form, the CES-D-10 scale, and the WHO’s Violence Against Women scale. A qualitative study and economic evaluation will be conducted alongside the main trial to probe participants perceptions on the intervention and assess economic cost and costs-effectiveness.Discussion This trial has the potential to inform a larger confirmatory trial which will be valuable for informing post-pandemic recovery efforts for caregivers of CALHIV and others disproportionally burdened by compounding health and social crises.Trial registration PACTR202311618532061. Registry name: Pan African Clinical Trial Registry (PACTR); URL: https://pactr.samrc.ac.za/; Registration date: 21-November-2023 (retrospectively registered); Date first participant enrolled: 24-August-2023
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.021 | 0.017 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.053 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".