MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396743083 · doi:10.1016/j.ogla.2024.04.010

The Association of Urinary Sodium Excretion with Glaucoma and Related Traits in a Large United Kingdom Population

2024· article· en· W4396743083 on OpenAlexaff
Kelsey V. Stuart, Mahantesh I. Biradar, Robert Luben, Neeraj Dhaun, Siegfried K. Wagner, Alasdair Warwick, Zihan Sun, Kian Madjedi, Louis R. Pasquale, Janey L. Wiggs, Jae H. Kang, Marleen A. H. Lentjes, Hugues Aschard, Jihye Kim, Paul J. Foster, Anthony P. Khawaja, Mark A. Chia, Sharon Chua, Ron Do, Alan Kastner, Giovanni Montesano, Naomi E. Allen, Tariq Aslam, Denize Atan, Sarah Barman, Graeme C. Black, Tasanee Braithwaite, Roxana O. Carare, Usha Chakravarthy, Michelle Chan, Alexander Day, Parul Desai, Bal Dhillon, Andrew D. Dick, Alex S. F. Doney, Cathy Egan, Sarah Ennis, Marcus Fruttiger, David F. Garway‐Heath, Jane Whitney Gibson, Jeremy A. Guggenheim, Christopher J. Hammond, Alison J. Hardcastle, Simon Harding, Ruth Hogg, Pirro G. Hysi, Pearse A. Keane, Peng T. Khaw, Gerassimos Lascaratos, Thomas J. Littlejohns, Andrew Lotery, Philip J. Luthert, Tom MacGillivray, Sarah Mackie, Bernadette McGuinness, Gareth J. McKay, Martin McKibbin, Tony Moore, James P. Morgan, Eoin O’Sullivan, Richard A. Oram, Christopher G. Owen, Praveen J. Patel, Euan Paterson, Tünde Pető, Axel Petzold, Nikolas Pontikos, Jugnoo S. Rahi, Alicja R. Rudnicka, Naveed Sattar, Jay Self, Panagiotis I. Sergouniotis, Sobha Sivaprasad, David Steel, Irene Stratton, Nicholas G. Strouthidis, Cathie Sudlow, Robyn J. Tapp, Dhanes Thomas, Emanuele Trucco, Adnan Tufail, Ananth C. Viswanathan, Véronique Vitart, Mike Weedon, Katie Williams, Cathy Williams, Jayne V. Woodside, Max Yates, Jennifer Yip, Yalin Zheng, Tin Aung, Kathryn P. Burdon, Li Chen, Ching‐Yu Cheng, Jamie E. Craig, Angela J. Cree, Victor de Vries, Sjoerd Driessen, John H. Fingert, Puya Gharahkhani, Caroline Hayward, Alex W. Hewitt, Nomdo M. Jansonius, Fridbert Jonansson, Jost B. Jonas, Michael A. Kass, Chiea Chuen Khor, Caroline C. W. Klaver, Jacyline Koh, Stuart MacGregor, David A. Mackey, Paul Mitchell, Calvin Chi Pui Pang, Francesca Pasutto, Norbert Pfeiffer, Ozren Polašek, Wishal D. Ramdas, Alexander Schuster, Ayellet V. Segrè, Einer Stefansson, Kāri Stefánsson, Guðmar Þorleifsson, Unnur Þorsteinsdóttir, Cornelia M. van Duijn, Joëlle Vergroesen, Eranga N. Vithana, James F. Wilson, Robert Wojciechowski, Tien Yin Wong, Terri L. Young

Bibliographic record

VenueOphthalmology Glaucoma · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlaucoma and retinal disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNational Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of OphthalmologyMedical Research CouncilAlconNational Institutes of HealthNational Eye InstituteMoorfields Eye CharityMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation TrustSantenWellcome TrustChief Scientist OfficeNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchLister Institute of Preventive MedicineARVO Foundation for Eye ResearchFight for Sight UKPfizerUniversity College LondonGlaucoma FoundationUK Research and InnovationResearch to Prevent Blindness
KeywordsMedicineGlaucomaOphthalmologyPopulationIntraocular pressureUrinary systemAssociation (psychology)OptometryInternal medicineEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: Excessive dietary sodium intake has known adverse effects on intravascular fluid volume and systemic blood pressure, which may influence intraocular pressure (IOP) and glaucoma risk. This study aimed to assess the association of urinary sodium excretion, a biomarker of dietary intake, with glaucoma and related traits, and determine whether this relationship is modified by genetic susceptibility to disease. DESIGN: Cross-sectional observational and gene-environment interaction analyses in the population-based UK Biobank study. PARTICIPANTS: Up to 103 634 individuals (mean age: 57 years; 51% women) with complete urinary, ocular, and covariable data. METHODS: Urine sodium:creatinine ratio (UNa:Cr; mmol:mmol) was calculated from a midstream urine sample. Ocular parameters were measured as part of a comprehensive eye examination, and glaucoma case ascertainment was through a combination of self-report and linked national hospital records. Genetic susceptibility to glaucoma was calculated based on a glaucoma polygenic risk score comprising 2673 common genetic variants. Multivariable linear and logistic regression, adjusted for key sociodemographic, medical, anthropometric, and lifestyle factors, were used to model associations and gene-environment interactions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Corneal-compensated IOP, OCT derived macular retinal nerve fiber layer and ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thickness, and prevalent glaucoma. RESULTS: In maximally adjusted regression models, a 1 standard deviation increase in UNa:Cr was associated with higher IOP (0.14 mmHg; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.12-0.17; P < 0.001) and greater prevalence of glaucoma (odds ratio, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.07-1.14; P < 0.001) but not macular retinal nerve fiber layer or ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness. Compared with those with UNa:Cr in the lowest quintile, those in the highest quintile had significantly higher IOP (0.45 mmHg; 95% CI, 0.36-0.53, P < 0.001) and prevalence of glaucoma (odds ratio, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.17-1.45; P < 0.001). Stronger associations with glaucoma (P interaction = 0.001) were noted in participants with a higher glaucoma polygenic risk score. CONCLUSIONS: Urinary sodium excretion, a biomarker of dietary intake, may represent an important modifiable risk factor for glaucoma, especially in individuals at high underlying genetic risk. These findings warrant further investigation because they may have important clinical and public health implications. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.477

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOphthalmology GlaucomaSame topicGlaucoma and retinal disordersFrench-language works237,207