Myxoid Inflammatory Myofibroblastic Sarcoma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The number of recognized sarcoma types harboring targetable molecular alterations continues to increase. Here we present 25 examples of a distinctive myofibroblastic tumor, provisionally termed "myxoid inflammatory myofibroblastic sarcoma," which might be related to inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor, and which occurred in 13 males (52%) and 12 females at a median age of 37 years (range: 7 to 79 years). Primary tumor sites were peritoneum (18 patients; 72%), paratesticular (2; 8%), chest wall (1), upper extremity (1), esophagus (1), retroperitoneum (1), and uterus (1). Nine peritoneal tumors (50%) were multifocal at presentation; all other tumors were unifocal. Tumors showed bland-to-mildly-atypical neoplastic myofibroblasts in a myxoid stroma, with prominent inflammatory infiltrates in 22 cases (88%). Most tumors showed delicate branching stromal vessels like those of myxoid liposarcoma, and most showed infiltrative growth through non-neoplastic tissue. Immunohistochemistry demonstrated expression of SMA (19/25 tumors; 76%), desmin (13/22; 59%), and CD30 (5/11; 45%), while ALK was expressed in 1 tumor (of 25; 4%) that was negative for ALK rearrangement. Sequencing of 11 tumors showed seven to harbor tyrosine kinase fusions (4 PDGFRB , 2 PML :: JAK1 , 1 SEC31A :: PDGFRA ). Two instead harbored hot spot KRAS mutations (G12V and Q61H), and 2 were negative for known driving alterations. Clinical follow-up was available for 18 patients (72%; median: 2.7 years; range: 4 mo-12.3 years). Nine patients (50%) were alive with no evidence of disease, 5 (28%) died of disease, and 4 (22%) were alive with disease. Seven patients (39%) experienced peritoneal relapse or distant metastasis. Two patients showed disease progression on conventional, nontargeted chemotherapy. The patient whose tumor harbored SEC31A :: PDGFRA was treated after multiple relapses with imatinib and sunitinib therapy, with progression-free periods of 5 and 2 years, respectively. Despite its bland appearance, myxoid inflammatory myofibroblastic sarcoma harbors a significant risk for disseminated disease, particularly when it occurs in the peritoneum. Targeted therapy could be considered for patients with disseminated disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".