MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396751446 · doi:10.1093/ehjacc/zuae036.138

Exposure to hyperoxemia and mortality in cardiac intensive care unit patients

2024· article· en· W4396751446 on OpenAlexaff
Carlos L. Alviar, Jacob C. Jentzer, Sean van Diepen, Thomas S. Metkus, P. Elliott Miller, Kianoush Kashani

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal Acute Cardiovascular Care · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory Support and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntensive care unitMedicineIntensive care medicineEmergency medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements None. Background Hyperoxemia (a high PaO2, i.e. >200-300 mmHg) has been associated with adverse outcomes in general critical care settings as well as in acute cardiovascular care conditions. The association between hyperoxemia and mortality has not been characterized in the heterogeneous population admitted to the cardiac intensive care unit (CICU). We aimed to examine the association between hyperoxemia on CICU admission with in-hospital mortality. Methods We retrospectively analyzed Mayo Clinic CICU patients from January 2007 to April 2018. PaO2 closest on admission was analyzed as a continuous variable (per 100 mmHg) and categorized as: 60-100 mmHg (51.9%), 101-150 mmHg (28.6%), 151-200 mmHg (10.6%), 201-300 mmHg (6.4%), and >300 mmHg (2.5%). Those without PaO2 on admission and those with hypoxemia were excluded. The primary outcome was all-cause in-hospital mortality evaluated using logistic regression, after adjusting for age, Charlson Comorbidity Index, M-CARS, and use of IMV and NIPPV. Results A total of 3,368 patients were included (median 70.3 years, 39.4% women). Admission diagnoses included ACS (37.0%, with 19.8% STEMI), HF (67.8%), shock (33.0%) and cardiac arrest (25.3%). Median admission PaO2 was 99 (IQR 78, 136) mmHg, with no difference in median PaO2 between hospital survivors and inpatient deaths (99 versus 98, p = 0.38). A J-shaped relationship was observed between admission PaO2 and in-hospital mortality (Figure A), with slightly higher mortality below 100 mmHg and incrementally higher mortality above this threshold (esp. at >200 mmHg). The incremental association between higher PaO2 and mortality (adjusted OR 1.17 per 100 mmHg higher, 95% CI 1.01-1.34, P = 0.03) was focused in the highest PaO2 group (i.e., >300 mmHg; Figure B). Conclusion Hyperoxia (esp. PaO2 >300 mmHg) on CICU admission is associated with increased in-hospital mortality, demonstrating a J-shaped association with an inflection point of lowest mortality around 100 mmHg. Further studies are warranted to assess if specific oxygen targets influence outcomes in critically ill cardiac patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.438
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart Journal Acute Cardiovascular CareSame topicRespiratory Support and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207