MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396752292 · doi:10.24215/23142561e286

El cuidado de sí: palabra y cuerpo en la formación de profesora/es de Educación Física

2024· article· es· W4396752292 on OpenAlex
Santiago Pich, Cristiano Mezzaroba, Fabiana Cristina Turelli, Alceu Junior Maciel, Letícia Baldasso Moraes, Paulo César de Carvalho Jacó

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEducación Física y Ciencia · 2024
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldPsychology
TopicHealth, Education, and Physical Culture
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersModerna
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El ensayo problematiza la idea moderna de formación de profesores de educación física referenciada en la noción de cuidado de sí a partir de la elaboración de Michel Foucault. Ese movimiento nos lleva a pensar la relación entre cuerpo y verdad que es constitutiva del modo hegemónico de formación de profesores construida con base en el par pedagogía-profesor(a) y a cuestionar la imposibilidad de la formación del sujeto ético en ese registro en el contexto de una política democrática. Por otro lado, con base en el concepto de cuidado de sí y en el par psicagogía-parresiasta elaboramos algunos principios que nos permiten construir otro modo de formación docente en el campo de la educación física, que tienen como clivaje la constitución del sujeto ético para la vida en común.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.557
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.352 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it