MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396764409 · doi:10.7143/jhep.51.224

The AI Revolution in Healthcare: From Image Diagnostic Support to the Prospects of Multimodal LLM

2024· article· en· W4396764409 on OpenAlexaff
Norio Nakata

Bibliographic record

VenueHealth Evaluation and Promotion · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMedical Imaging and Analysis
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

第3次AIブームは2000年代初頭のディープラーニングの登場から始まり、画像認識において特に進展した。2017年のtransformerアルゴリズムの登場により自然言語処理が進化し、ChatGPTなどの大規模言語モデルが登場し第4次AIブームが始まった。医療分野では、画像診断支援AIの導入が進み、FDAやPMDAによって多くの医療機器が認可されている。将来的には、言語、画像、その他のデータを統合するマルチモーダル大規模言語モデル(LLM)の開発が期待されている。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.064

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.009
Scholarly communication0.0060.009
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0050.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHealth Evaluation and PromotionSame topicMedical Imaging and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207