A novel LiDAR-GNSS-INS Two-Phase Tightly Coupled integration scheme for precise navigation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract. Recent advances in precise navigation have extensively utilized the integration of Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) and Inertial Navigation System (INS), particularly in the domain of intelligent vehicles. However, the efficacy of such navigation systems is considerably compromised by the reflection and multipath disruptions of non-light-of-sight (NLOS) signals. Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR)-based odometry, an active perception-based sensor known for its precise 3D measurements, has become increasingly prevalent in augmenting navigation systems. Nonetheless, the assimilation of LiDAR odometry with GNSS/INS systems presents substantial challenges. Addressing these challenges, this study introduces a two-phase sensor fusion (TPSF) approach that synergistically combines GNSS positioning, LiDAR odometry, and IMU pre-integration through a dual-stage sensor fusion process. The initial stage employs an Extended Kalman Filter (EKF) to amalgamate the GNSS solution with IMU Mechanization, facilitating the estimation of IMU biases and system initialization. Subsequently, the second stage integrates scan-to-map LiDAR odometry with IMU mechanization to support continuous LiDAR factor estimation. Factor graph optimization (FGO) is then utilized for the comprehensive fusion of LiDAR factors, IMU pre-integration, and GNSS solutions. The efficacy of the proposed methodology is corroborated through rigorous testing on a demanding trajectory from an urbanized open-source dataset, with the system demonstrating a notable enhancement in performance compared to the state-of-the-art algorithms, achieving a translational Standard Deviation (STD) of 1.269 meters.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".