Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The BLI (boundary layer ingestion) concept for propulsion seeks to improve the energy efficiency of aircraft propulsion. This is achieved by accelerating low momentum flow ingested from boundary layers and wakes developed over the fuselage through the fan. A major challenge that needs to be overcome to realise the benefits is that the fan needs to work efficiently in distorted flow. Understanding the effects of distortion on the aerodynamic performance and the distortion transfer through the fan is therefore essential to future designs. A BLI fan, designed at reduced scale, is used for analytic modelling and experiments in a rig designed for this purpose. The test rig replicates BLI conditions for a fan installed at the aircraft tail cone. An unsteady model that includes all blades and vanes of the fan, as well as the nacelle and the by-pass duct of the test rig is used for CFD (computational fluid dynamics) simulations. Test results are used to confirm that the CFD model is representative of the aerodynamics of the fan. The tests are conducted using varying fan operating conditions but also tests with an added distortion screen. Analysis results are then used to investigate the effects of distortion on the fan efficiency, as well as on the overall efficiency. The fan efficiency is found to be moderately decreased depending on the level of and extent of inlet circumferential distortion. In terms of overall energy efficiency, a net improvement over a similar fan in clean inlet flow is found.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it