MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396779173 · doi:10.1139/cjp-2023-0276

A semi-analytic approximation for a single-particle continuum wavefunction

2024· article· en· W4396779173 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Robin Shakeshaft

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLaser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsWave functionQuantum mechanicsQuantum electrodynamicsWave–particle dualityClassical mechanicsMathematical physicsStatistical physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A moderately simple approximation to the radial wavefunction of an unbound particle which carries arbitrary angular momentum l( l + 1) and which scatters from any physical potential, including one with a Coulomb tail, is presented. The approximate wavefunction has the form of a linear combination of short- and long-range analytical functions that satisfies the correct boundary conditions at both the origin and at large distances. The coefficients of the short-range functions are determined by solving a matrix equation whose elements are highly suited to numerical quadrature, and which are hardly more difficult to evaluate for l ≫ 1 than for l = 0. The coefficients of the long-range functions are determined by both the nature of the interaction at large distances and the cusp condition on the wavefunction at the origin. This wavefunction has been tested by application to pure Coulomb scattering and to electron scattering from hydrogen within the 1s–2s–2p close coupling framework.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicLaser-Plasma Interactions and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207