MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

IMPLEMENTACIÓN DE LAS GUÍAS DE LA RNAO EN LA CARRERA DE ENFERMERÍA DE LA UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE CHILE

2024· article· es· W4396783268 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
María Benavides-Roca, Adrian Núñez-González, Luis Benavides-Roca

Bibliographic record

VenueHorizonte de enfermeria · 2024
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth and Medical Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesMedicinePolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La enfermería basada en evidencia se posiciona como una alternativa fiable ante las necesidades actuales de la enfermería, a partir de eso las guías de buenas prácticas de la RNAO (Asociación Profesional de Enfermeras de Ontario) son una herramienta optimizadora del sistema de salud, abarcando las áreas clínicas y académicas de la enfermería. El objetivo del presente estudio es describir la experiencia de la implementación de las guías de buenas prácticas de la RNAO en el pregrado de la carrera de Enfermería de la Universidad Autónoma de Chile, sede Talca. Este artículo reflexiona sobre el fortalecimiento del modelo curricular de la carrera de enfermería a partir de la implementación de un marco para la acción que se encuentra respaldado por la evidencia científica del programa de Best Practice Spot-light Organizations (BPSO®).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.427
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.446
Teacher spread0.428 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHorizonte de enfermeriaSame topicHealth and Medical EducationFrench-language works237,207