MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396790690 · doi:10.1080/2576117x.2021.2004834

Skew Deviation

2022· article· en· W4396790690 on OpenAlexaff
Jocelyn Zurevinsky

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Binocular Vision and Ocular Motility · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicVestibular and auditory disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ocular skew deviation is an acute vertical misalignment resulting from the disruption of vestibular input to the interstitial nucleus of Cajal, involving the utriculo-ocular pathway, the cerebellum or the thalamus. A large percentage of skew cases associated with globe torsion and head tilt have complex or sinister etiologies, necessitating its differentiation from more common causes of acute onset vertical deviation in a sensitive and cost-efficient manner.This paper briefly reviews the anatomy and vestibular function of the inner ear, outlines the utriculo-ocular pathway, and discusses the things you need to know about skew to aid in clinical oculo-motor practice in 2022.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.628
Threshold uncertainty score0.370

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Binocular Vision and Ocular MotilitySame topicVestibular and auditory disordersFrench-language works237,207